Emily Olsen / healthcaredive - The American Hospital Association argues new policies from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk requiring providers to submit more claims data on dispensed 340B drugs is onerous and unlawful.
AI Summary: Hospitals and provider groups are urging federal regulators to halt new drugmaker policies that expand claims-data reporting tied to 340B discounts, calling the requirements unlawful and administratively burdensome. The dispute pits safety-net providers against manufacturers seeking program transparency — a classic tug-of-war with patients’ financial stakes caught in the middle.
Congress moves to curb HHS' 340B rebate pilot with bill / 22 days
Optum Rx/Caremark and FTC edge toward settlement in insulin case / 5 months
Tampa General sues Eli Lilly over pulled 340B discounts / 7 wks
340B discounts face reform as profits outpace patient benefit / 4 months
AbbVie sues HHS over 340B patient definition and guidance / 4 months
CMS ends Medicare Part D premium subsidy for drug plans / 4 wks
D.C. appeals court upholds HHS control in 340B rebate dispute / 5 wks
StackHealth RSS


StackHealth Time Machine
NorthFeed Inc. Terms and Conditions / Privacy Policy
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the content. Users are encouraged to verify all details independently. We accept no liability for errors, omissions, or any decisions made based on this information.